<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AustinStartup - Latest Comments in Indeed Surpasses Monster and Careerbuilder in Traffic</title><link>http://austinstartup.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://austinstartup.disqus.com/indeed_surpasses_monster_and_careerbuilder_in_traffic/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:30:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Indeed Surpasses Monster and Careerbuilder in Traffic</title><link>http://www.austinstartup.com/2008/11/indeed-surpasses-monster-and-careerbuilder-in-traffic/#comment-16240093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the world of online recruiting, pageviews are not a very accurate measure of actual traffic.  ComScore is widely recognized as the most accurate and unbiased measurement in the industry, and they track a much more accurate metric - UNIQUE VISITORS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As of ComScore MediaMetrix's October report, &lt;a href="http://Indeed.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Indeed.com"&gt;Indeed.com&lt;/a&gt; had 6.375M Unique Visitors to their site compared to 24.033M Unique Visitors to CareerBuilder and 13.248M Unique Visitors to Monster.  While Indeed has certainly grown it's UVs at a rapid rate over the last 6 months, it certainly has not caught up to the leaders in the industry in terms of actual traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kristen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:30:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Indeed Surpasses Monster and Careerbuilder in Traffic</title><link>http://www.austinstartup.com/2008/11/indeed-surpasses-monster-and-careerbuilder-in-traffic/#comment-16240092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The recruiters and HR folks on the &lt;a href="http://ABout.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="ABout.com"&gt;ABout.com&lt;/a&gt; survey didnt feel Monster had very good candidates.  They did a survey of the top 10 job sites and monster didnt get a lot of votes:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://humanresources.about.com/gi/pages/poll.htm?poll_id=5763275227&amp;amp;linkback=http://humanresources.about.com/b/a/258241.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://humanresources.about.com/gi/pages/poll.htm?poll_id=5763275227&amp;amp;linkback=http://humanresources.about.com/b/a/258241.htm"&gt;http://humanresources.about...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:46:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Indeed Surpasses Monster and Careerbuilder in Traffic</title><link>http://www.austinstartup.com/2008/11/indeed-surpasses-monster-and-careerbuilder-in-traffic/#comment-16240091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://About.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="About.com"&gt;About.com&lt;/a&gt; just added 3 new employment sites to their top 10 job site list:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.linkedin.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.linkedin.com"&gt;www.linkedin.com&lt;/a&gt; (networking)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.indeed.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.indeed.com"&gt;www.indeed.com&lt;/a&gt; (aggregated lists)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.realmatch.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.realmatch.com"&gt;www.realmatch.com&lt;/a&gt; (matches you to jobs)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whole Top 10 list here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://jobsearch.about.com/od/joblistings/tp/jobbanks.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jobsearch.about.com/od/joblistings/tp/jobbanks.htm"&gt;http://jobsearch.about.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>